top of page

The Dark Side of Vision: The Impact of Artificial Blue Light on Sleep and Circadian Rhythms


The relationship between sleep and the visual system has emerged as a critical area of study in recent years, particularly in light of the increasingly ubiquitous presence of artificial blue-light in our daily lives (Teran, 2020). This essay will examine the negative impact of excessive exposure to artificial blue light at night on the circadian system and the role of intrinsically photosensitive retinal ganglion cells (ipRGCs) in regulating the dark side of vision, pupillary response, and melatonin suppression. Through a comprehensive analysis of various theoretical frameworks, limitations, and alternative solutions, we will explore the intricacies of this complex and timely topic.

I. The Prevalence of Artificial Blue Light and Its Effects on Sleep

In contemporary society, exposure to artificial blue light has become increasingly prevalent due to the widespread use of electronic devices such as smartphones, tablets, and LED screens. These devices emit high-energy visible (HEV) blue light, which has been linked to disruptions in circadian rhythms, sleep patterns, and overall health (Cajochen et al., 2011).

Research on the impact of artificial blue light exposure on sleep spans multiple disciplines, including sleep science, chronobiology, and neuroscience. Findings have shown that exposure to blue light, particularly in the evening, can delay the onset of melatonin production, leading to disruptions in the natural sleep-wake cycle (Gooley et al., 2010). This can result in difficulties falling asleep, reduced sleep quality, and insufficient sleep duration, which can contribute to negative consequences for mental and physical health.

II. The Role of Intrinsically Photosensitive Retinal Ganglion Cells (ipRGCs)

Intrinsically photosensitive retinal ganglion cells (ipRGCs) play a crucial role in mediating the impact of blue light on sleep and circadian rhythms. These specialized retinal cells are sensitive to blue light wavelengths and are responsible for regulating several non-image-forming visual functions, including circadian photoentrainment, pupillary light reflex, and melatonin suppression (Berson et al., 2002).

The disruption of ipRGC function due to excessive exposure to artificial blue light at night has been linked to sleep disturbances and potential long-term health implications (Bedrosian & Nelson, 2017). As our understanding of ipRGCs continues to develop, it is essential to consider the broader implications of this research on our daily lives and the potential consequences of ignoring the dark side of vision.

III. Theoretical Frameworks and Critical Approaches

The study of sleep and artificial blue light exposure incorporates various theoretical frameworks and critical approaches. Contributions from sleep science, chronobiology, and neuroscience have advanced our understanding of the underlying biological mechanisms that govern sleep and circadian rhythms. However, each discipline offers unique strengths and weaknesses in addressing this complex issue.

Interdisciplinary approaches to the study of sleep and the visual system can provide valuable insights by integrating scientific findings with literary theory and cultural analysis. For instance, exploring the cultural significance of sleep and the visual system can illuminate the ways in which our understanding of these phenomena is shaped by historical, social, and technological contexts.

IV. Limitations, Problems, and Solutions

A. Challenges in measuring and quantifying the impact of blue light on sleep

The exploration of the impact of artificial blue light on sleep has encountered various limitations and challenges. One notable issue is the inherent variability in individual responses to blue light exposure (Cajochen et al., 2011). While some people may exhibit significant sleep disturbances following exposure to artificial blue light, others may experience minimal or no noticeable effects. This variability complicates efforts to establish clear causal links between blue light exposure and sleep disruptions.

Moreover, the difficulty in controlling for various confounding factors poses another challenge in this research area. Factors such as age, pre-existing health conditions, lifestyle choices, and the use of sleep aids can all influence an individual's sleep patterns (Figueiro & Overington, 2016), making it difficult to isolate the specific effects of blue light exposure. Consequently, researchers must exercise caution in drawing definitive conclusions based on limited or inconclusive data.

B. Potential solutions and alternatives

Despite the challenges and limitations associated with studying the impact of artificial blue light on sleep, various solutions and alternatives can help mitigate its negative effects. One widely recommended strategy is the use of blue light filters on electronic devices, particularly during nighttime hours (Gringras et al., 2015). These filters can significantly reduce the amount of blue light emitted by screens, thereby minimizing the disruption of the circadian system and melatonin production.

Additionally, it is crucial to establish and maintain healthy sleep hygiene practices. Reducing screen time before bed, establishing a consistent sleep schedule, and creating a sleep-friendly environment can all contribute to better sleep quality and duration (Hirshkowitz et al., 2015). Furthermore, individuals can benefit from exposure to natural light during the day, which can help regulate circadian rhythms and improve overall sleep patterns (Wright et al., 2013).

In terms of research and policy, further interdisciplinary collaboration between sleep scientists, chronobiologists, neuroscientists, and other relevant experts can help to overcome the limitations and challenges associated with studying the effects of artificial blue light on sleep. By combining diverse perspectives and methodological approaches, researchers can develop a more comprehensive understanding of the underlying mechanisms and potential solutions.

Moreover, public health campaigns and educational initiatives can raise awareness of the potential consequences of excessive blue light exposure, particularly in the context of sleep and overall well-being (Figueiro & Overington, 2016). By disseminating evidence-based information and promoting healthy sleep habits, individuals can be empowered to make informed choices about their relationship with technology and the potential impact on their sleep patterns.

Final remarks

As our understanding of the complex interplay between sleep and the visual system continues to evolve, it is vital to consider the potential long-term effects of excessive artificial blue light exposure on circadian rhythms and overall well-being. By critically examining the role of ipRGCs and the current theoretical frameworks, we can develop a more nuanced understanding of the dark side of vision and its impact on sleep. Furthermore, identifying limitations in our knowledge and exploring potential solutions will contribute to a healthier and more balanced relationship with technology in our daily lives.

Emiliano Teran


  1. Berson, D. M., Dunn, F. A., & Takao, M. (2002). Phototransduction by retinal ganglion cells that set the circadian clock. Science, 295(5557), 1070-1073. DOI:10.1126/science.1067262

  2. Bedrosian, T. A., & Nelson, R. J. (2017). Timing of light exposure affects mood and brain circuits. Translational Psychiatry, 7(1), e1017. DOI: 10.1038/tp.2016.262

  3. Cajochen, C., Frey, S., Anders, D., Späti, J., Bues, M., Pross, A., ... & Stefani, O. (2011). Evening exposure to a light-emitting diodes (LED)-backlit computer screen affects circadian physiology and cognitive performance. Journal of Applied Physiology, 110(5), 1432-1438. DOI: 10.1152/japplphysiol.00165.2011

  4. Figueiro, M. G., & Overington, D. (2016). Self-luminous devices and melatonin suppression in adolescents. Lighting Research & Technology, 48(8), 966-975. DOI: 10.1177/1477153515584979

  5. Gooley, J. J., Chamberlain, K., Smith, K. A., Khalsa, S. B., Rajaratnam, S. M., Reen, E. V., ... & Lockley, S. W. (2010). Exposure to room light before bedtime suppresses melatonin onset and shortens melatonin duration in humans. The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism, 96(3), E463-E472. DOI: 10.1210/jc.2009-1942

  6. Gringras, P., Middleton, B., Skene, D. J., & Revell, V. L. (2015). Bigger, brighter, bluer-better? Current light-emitting devices – adverse sleep properties and preventative strategies. Frontiers in Public Health, 3, 233. DOI: 10.3389/fpubh.2015.00233

  7. Hirshkowitz, M., Whiton, K., Albert, S. M., Alessi, C., Bruni, O., DonCarlos, L., ... & Neubauer, D. N. (2015). National Sleep Foundation’s sleep time duration recommendations: methodology and results summary. Sleep Health, 1(1), 40-43. DOI: 10.1016/j.sleh.2014.12.010

  8. Teran, E., Yee-Rendon, C. M., Ortega-Salazar, J., De Gracia, P., Garcia-Romo, E., & Woods, R. L. (2020). Evaluation of two strategies for alleviating the impact on the circadian cycle of smartphone screens. Optometry and Vision Science, 97(3), 207-217.DOI: 10.1097/OPX.0000000000001485

  9. Wright, K. P., McHill, A. W., Birks, B. R., Griffin, B. R., Rusterholz, T., & Chinoy, E. D. (2013). Entrainment of the human circadian clock to the natural light-dark cycle. Current Biology, 23(16), 1554-1558. DOI: 10.1016/j.cub.2013.06.039


bottom of page